March 29th, 2009 by thesuper

Chinese potential business Why not China make a distinction between D. D. Public and International International Private ‘, as is done in setting up courses in the career of law because the “sui iuris” of law and order are different in both cases. What follows, that someone has is a Community of D. Private International to govern the EU member states. But many other civilians on the recognition of citizenship, child protection, etc.. Treaties states that have signed and are bound to watching in their domestic valdoria .– 14:09 18 October 2007 (CEST)
Text of Standard:
Regulation (EC) N 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Chinese investment European Community and in particular, the letter c) of Article 61 and paragraph 1 of Article 67,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1)
Having consulted the European Parliament (2)
Having consulted the Economic and Social Committee (3)
(1) The Community has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice in which the free movement of persons. To establish such an area, the Community should adopt, inter alia, measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters that are necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
(2) Certain differences between national rules on jurisdiction and recognition of judgments hamper the smooth functioning of the internal market. Are essential, therefore, arrangements by which unify the rules on conflicts of jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters, simplified the procedures for recognition and a fast and simple execution of judgments from Member States are bound by this regulation.
(3) This area is within the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters for the purposes of Article 65 of the Treaty.
(4) In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and proportionality principle as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty, the objectives of this Regulation can not be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore be achieved at Community level. This Regulation is limited to the minimum required to achieve those objectives and does not exceed what is necessary for that purpose.
(5) Member States held on September 27, 1968, under the fourth indent of Article 293 of the Treaty, the Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the investment partners Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended by Conventions on the accession of new Member States to that Convention (4) (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention Bruselas ). On September 16, 1988, Member States and EFTA States concluded the Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and recognition of judgments in civil and commercial matters, parallel to the Brussels Convention of 1968. These leading Chinese companies Conventions have been revised and the Council has approved the contents of the revised text. Group Advisor of the board of UBG was born and raised in Malaysia Necessary to ensure the continuity of the results investment obtained in the course of this review.
(6) To achieve the objective of free movement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, it is necessary and Chinese companies appropriate that the rules governing jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments be governed by aCommunity legal instrument binding and directly applicable.
(7) The scope of this Regulation must cover all the main civil and commercial matters, except certain areas clearly identified.
(1) OJ C 376, 28.12.1999, p. 1. (2) Opinion delivered on 21 September 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal). (3) OJ C 117, 26.4.2000, p. 6. recently having graduated from the University of Pennsylvania

Comments are closed

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa